Statements: Some participants are students.
                    Some students are boys.
Conclusions I. No boy is a participant.
                    II. All boys are participants.

Statements: All laptops are computers
                    Some laptops are notebooks.
Conclusions I. Some notebook are computers
                    II. All notebooks are computers.

Statements: All rows are lines
                     All lines are queues.
Conclusions
                   I. All rows are queues.
                   II. Atleast some queues are lines.

In the question below, two statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the two statements to be true even if they seem to be variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding the commonly known facts.
Statements: Some rings are circles.
                    No circle is a square.
Conclusion I. No ring is a square.
                   II. All rings are squares.

In this question relationships between different elements are shown in the statements. These statements are followed by two conclusions.
Statements D˂E˂F˂G
                    K˃F
Conclusion I. K≤G
                   II. K˃D

In question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.
Give answer
(a) if only argument I is strong.
(b) if only argument II is strong.
(c) if either I or II is strong.
(d) if neither I nor II is strong.
(e) if both argument I and II are strong.

Statement : Should the sex determination test during pregnancy be completely banned ?
Arguments :
I . Yes , this leads to indiscriminate female foeticide and eventually will lead to social imbalance .
II . No , people have a right to know about their unborn child . 

In question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.
Give answer
(a) if only argument I is strong.
(b) if only argument II is strong.
(c) if either I or II is strong.
(d) if neither I nor II is strong.
(e) if both argument I and II are strong.

Statement: Should India engage into a dialogue with neighbouring countries to stop cross border tension?

Arguments

I. Yes, this is the only way to reduce the cross border terrorism and stop loss of innocent lives.

II. No, neighbouring countries cannot be relied upon in such matters, they may still engage in subversive

Activities.

In each question below are given statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have taken the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read the conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer.  
( a ) Only I follow.
( b ) Only II follow.
( c ) If either I or II follows.  
( d ) Neither I nor II follows.  
( e ) Both I and II follow.

Statement:
 Some highways are roads.
 All roads are streets.
 Conclusion:
 ( I ) All highways being streets is a possibility
 ( II ) Some streets are not highways