Arguments :
I . Yes , this leads to indiscriminate female foeticide and eventually will lead to social imbalance .
II . No , people have a right to know about their unborn child .
In question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.
Give answer
(a) if only argument I is strong.
(b) if only argument II is strong.
(c) if either I or II is strong.
(d) if neither I nor II is strong.
(e) if both argument I and II are strong.
Statement: Should India engage into a dialogue with neighbouring countries to stop cross border tension?
Arguments
I. Yes, this is the only way to reduce the cross border terrorism and stop loss of innocent lives.
II. No, neighbouring countries cannot be relied upon in such matters, they may still engage in subversive
Activities.
789 05e3ba9b8791f164649530000In each question below are given statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have taken the two given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read the conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Give answer.
( a ) Only I follow.
( b ) Only II follow.
( c ) If either I or II follows.
( d ) Neither I nor II follows.
( e ) Both I and II follow.
Statement:
Some highways are roads.
All roads are streets.
Conclusion:
( I ) All highways being streets is a possibility
( II ) Some streets are not highways