Statement and Conclusion Quest...

Statements:   T > D ≥ P ,      F ≥ P = R

 Conclusions: T > R ,   D > F

In the following question a statement is given followed by three statements numbered as I, II and III. You have to read all three statements and decide which of them strengthens or weakens the statement.
Statement: Among the governments, there is a strong policy emphasis on improving living conditions in urban areas as more and more people are looking to migrate to semi-urban or rural areas. People are willing to compromise on their standard of living in order to live in a healthier/pollution free environment.
(I) Cities are economically vibrant spaces around the world and drawing a large number of rural migrants looking for better prospects. This is a sustained trend, particularly in developing countries now a day.
(II) A fresh look at urban governance is necessary as migration from rural areas picks up pace.
(III) The rate of migration has shown a consecutive decline in the last three Censuses. It was possible that this slow-down signalled the worsening conditions in urban slums, where most of the rural immigrants were concentrated.

Given below are two statements. Take these to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read the conclusions that follow and decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements. 

 Statements: 

All sweets are biscuits. 

All biscuits are cakes.

Conclusions:

1. All cakes are biscuits.

2. All sweets are cakes.

Consider the given statement to be true and decide which of the conclusion(s) logically follows from the statement.

Statements:

1. No sweet is biscuit.

2. No biscuit is cake.

Conclusions:

1. Some sweets can be biscuits.

2. All biscuit can be cake.

Two statements are followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You should take both the statements to be true even if there is a difference of commonly known facts. You decide which of the given conclusions is definitely taken from the given statements.

Statements:

(i) All pens are pencils.

(ii) All books are pencils.

Conclusions:

I: All pens are books.

II: Some books are pens.