All goats are tigers.
All tigers are lions.
Conclusions :
I. All tigers are goats
II. All lions are tigers
III. No goat is a lion
IV. No lion is a goat
Statements:
Some clerks are poor.
A is poor.
Conclusion:
I. A is clerk
II. A has a large family
741 05f698b49558d255013b299f4Directions: In each question of below are two / three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II . You have to take the two / three given statements. to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.
Give answer
(1) If only conclusion I follows
(2) If only conclusion II follows
(3) If either conclusion I or conclusion II follows
(4) If neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows
(5) If both conclusion I and conclusion II follow
Statements:
All kites are birds.
No kite is a glider.
Conclusions:
I. Some gliders are definitely not birds.
II . At least some birds are kites.
In the following question a statement is given followed by three statements numbered as I, II and III. You have to read all three statements and decide which of them strengthens or weakens the statement.
Statement: Among the governments, there is a strong policy emphasis on improving living conditions in urban areas as more and more people are looking to migrate to semi-urban or rural areas. People are willing to compromise on their standard of living in order to live in a healthier/pollution free environment.
(I) Cities are economically vibrant spaces around the world and drawing a large number of rural migrants looking for better prospects. This is a sustained trend, particularly in developing countries now a day.
(II) A fresh look at urban governance is necessary as migration from rural areas picks up pace.
(III) The rate of migration has shown a consecutive decline in the last three Censuses. It was possible that this slow-down signalled the worsening conditions in urban slums, where most of the rural immigrants were concentrated.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements.
Statements:
A. Some cats are dogs.
B. Some trees are dogs.
Conclusions:
(I) Some dogs are cats.
(II) Some cats are trees.
725 061123e8c88e0566940a27d93Directions: - Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.
Statement:
Should students take part in politics?
Arguments:
I. Yes, it inculcates in them qualities of leadership.
II. No, they should study and build up their career.
Direction: In these questions, relation between different elements is shown in the statements. The statements are followed by two conclusions. Study the conclusions based on the given statement and select the appropriate answer.
Statement: M ≤ K > L = Y; P ≤ T >M
Conclusions:
I. P> Y
II. T< L