Directions: - Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a ‘strong’ argument and which is a ‘weak’ argument.
Statement: 
Should there be concentration of foreign investment in only few states?
Arguments: 
I. No, it is against the policy of overall development of the country.
II. Yes, large number of states lack infrastructure to attract foreign investment 

Direction: In each question below a statement is given followed by two courses of action numbered I and II. A course of action is practicable and feasible step or administrative decision to be taken for follow-up improvement, or further action in regard to the problem, policy, etc. On the basis of the information given in the statement, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and decide which of the suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing.
Statement: Many over- qualified professionals are now opting for lower ranked jobs owing to recession in the market which has made new recruitment's almost nil in the recent months.
Course of Action:
I. Over qualified people should not be allowed to undertake jobs which do not suit their academic qualifications.
II. Such Candidates should be encouraged to postpone undertaking a job until recession subsides.

Direction: In the question given below , two statements are given followed by four Conclusion I, II, III and IV.You have to consider the two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts .You have to decide which of the given conclusion , if any , follow from the given statements. 

Statements: 
 All benches are table.
 No table is chair.
 Conclusion: 
 I. All benches are chairs
 II. All tables are benches
 III. No tables are benches
 IV. No benches are chairs

Directions : In each of the questions below are given four statements followed by three conclusions numbered I, II, and III. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.

Statement:
1. All children are students.
2. All students are players.
Conclusion:
I. All cricketers are students.
II. All children are players.

Statements: Students learn in schools, because they understand what they are taught.
Conclusion:
I. Students' learning in schools depends on their learning ability.
II. It depends on what students learn in schools. How they are taught.

Statement: 

Should words like 'Smoking is injurious to health' essentially appear on cigarette packs? 

Arguments: 

I. Yes, it is a sort of brain wash to make the smokers realize that they are inhaling poisonous stuff. 

II. No, It hampers the enjoyment of smoking 

Direction: - In each question below is given a statement followed by two assumptions numbered I and II. An assumption is something supposed or taken for granted. You have to consider the statement and the following assumptions and decide which of the assumptions is implicit in the statement.

Given answer

( a ) If only assumption I is implicit.

( b ) If only assumption II is implicit.

( c ) Either I or II is implicit.

( d ) If neither I nor II is implicit.

( e ) If both I and II are implicit. 

Statement: -

A warning in a train compartment –“To stop train, pull chain. Penalty for improper use Rs. 500.”

Assumptions

 I. Some people misuse the alarm chain.

II. On certain occasions, people may want to stop a running train.

Statement: 

Should the opinion polls predicting outcome of elections before the elections be banned in India? 

Arguments: 

I. Yes, this may affect the voters’ mind and may affect the outcome.

 II. No, such polls are conducted all over the world.