Directions: In each of the following questions, there is a Assertion and a Reason, choose the correct alternative from the following-

Assertion (A) : Milk production in India is low a compared to other countries of the world.
Reason (R): The animal rearers in India are poor.

Statement: 

Is paying ransom tow agreeing to the conditions of kidnappers of political figures, a proper course of action? 

Arguments 

I. Yes, The victims must be saved at all cost 

II. No, It encourages the kidnappers to continue their sinister activities. 

Directions: In each question below, three statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the given statements, disregarding the commonly known facts.
Give answer
(A) If only conclusion II follows.
(B) If both conclusions I and II follow.
(C) If only conclusion I follows.
(D) neither conclusion I nor II follows.
(E) either conclusion I or II follows.

Statements:
All pigs are animals.
No animal is a bird.
No bird is a dog.
Conclusions:
I. Some animals being dogs is a possibility.
II. All pigs being birds is a possibility.

Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. 

Give answer 

( a ) if only argument I is strong. 

( b ) if only argument II is strong. 

( c) if either I or II is strong. 

( d ) if neither I nor II is strong. 

( e ) if both arguments I and II are strong.

Statement: 

Should colleges be given the status of a university in India? 

Arguments 

I. Yes, colleges are in a better position to assess the student's performance and therefore the degrees will be more valid. 

II. No, it is utopian to think that there will not be nepotism and corruption in awarding degrees by colleges. 

Statement: 

Should family planning be made compulsory in India? 

Arguments: 

I. Yes, looking to the miser able conditions in India there is no other go. 

II. No, in India there are people of various religions and family planning is against the tenet of some of the religions. 

In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions if any, follows from the given statements.
Statements:
I. Some wild are carnivores.
II. All wild are lions.
Conclusions:
I. All carnivores are lions.
II. Some lions are carnivores.

Below are given statements followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts.
Statements:
Some cars are trees.
All trees are trucks.
All trucks are tyres.
Conclusions:
I. Some tyres are cars
II. All trees are tyres.

Direction : Following question consists of six statements followed by five conclusions. Consider the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions does not logically follow from the given statements using all statements together. 

Statements: All moon are star.
All star are light.
Some light are stone.
Some stone is blue.
No blue is kite.
All kite are machine.
Conclusions:
(A) All moon being stone is a possibility.
(B) All moon being blue is a possibility.
(C) Some stone are not kite.
(D) All blue being machine is a possibility.
(E) All stone being kite is a possibility.